Celtic are among the clubs to have learned of the Scottish FA’s abolition of the Key Match Incident Review (KMI) Panel, bringing an end to a system that generated plenty of debate but carried very little authority.
The three-person panel was introduced in September 2024 and featured one independent member, one laws of the game expert and one representative from the SPFL clubs. Celtic found themselves at the heart of one decision last season.
Meeting every week, the group reviewed major on-field refereeing decisions, with the outcome of each discussion published on the Scottish FA’s website.
Despite the attention those verdicts attracted, the panel was never given any formal powers. It could not alter results, overturn decisions or change disciplinary outcomes. It existed solely to offer an opinion on controversial incidents.
That distinction was often lost throughout last season.
One of the biggest examples came during Celtic’s penultimate Premiership fixture away to Motherwell. After a VAR review, Martin O’Neill’s side were awarded a penalty for handball.
When the Key Match Incident Review Panel later voted 2-1 against the VAR intervention, social media quickly filled with claims that Celtic’s eventual league triumph had somehow been exposed.
Those reactions overlooked what the panel actually was.
Its findings were never intended to act as a tribunal or an official verdict on whether referees had reached the right conclusion. They were simply the opinions of three individuals. The fact the vote itself was split, with one member backing the decision made at Fir Park, only reinforced that point.
Handball incidents have long divided opinion across football and remain among the most subjective calls officials have to make. The Motherwell decision became another reminder that reasonable people can arrive at different conclusions after watching the same footage.
Stephen McGowan has now reported that the Scottish FA have decided to scrap the panel altogether.
Instead, it will be replaced by regular meetings with managers and club captains, who will be allowed to convey their views.
That decision will not change the weekly debate surrounding officiating in Scottish football. Supporters, pundits and former referees will continue to analyse contentious moments; as they should.
The difference is that one source of opinion has now disappeared. Given the panel never had the power to influence results and, by all accounts, carried little weight with current officials, its abolition serves as a reminder of what the system actually was: an opinion forum rather than an authority on refereeing decisions.
Keep Reading
2 responses
Any dialogue between clubs and officials is welcome, so long as it’s not just a tick box exercise.
TBH I’m at a loss as to what this particular idea will in fact do. If the huns are asked to attend these meetings if they were denied a dodgy penalty, we all know a penalty will come their way the game after, being a cynic I think all it will do is pressure the officials
should be independent but some one outside the country and stays on the outside looking at videos we don’t need to no his name but will it work will