Wilfried Nancy’s rise in MLS has made him one of the most interesting coaching candidates to cross the Atlantic in recent years, but his time at CF Montréal carries a chapter that Celtic will need to understand fully.
His departure from the Canadian club in 2022 followed a breakdown in relations with owner Joey Saputo, a story that has been well documented across MLS reporting. It wasn’t a disagreement over tactics or transfers. It was about the environment, the hierarchy and where the line sits between support and interference.
Celtic are close to appointing Nancy because they see a head coach who thrives inside structure, communicates well and develops players. But they also know this will be the most demanding job of his career. The fallout in Montréal offers both a warning and an insight into how Nancy operates under pressure.
At Montréal, the Frenchman built a strong reputation with the squad and staff. Players respected him and performance levels remained high. The problem came from above. Saputo’s emotional reactions to defeats, including a notorious post-match incident where he berated players and staff, shattered Nancy’s trust. That moment became the catalyst for his departure. Montréal’s sporting director wanted him to stay. The players wanted him to stay. But Nancy made it clear that the relationship with the owner had crossed a line.
Celtic sit in a very different football landscape, but the club’s own hierarchy has had its share of friction with managers over the years. The question, then, is simple: does Nancy’s Montréal experience suggest potential trouble ahead, or does it actually make him a better fit for Celtic’s structure?
Nancy’s split from CF Montréal centred on one thing: respect. He accepted the constraints placed on him, he accepted working under a tight budget, and he accepted a system where the sporting director handled recruitment. None of that caused friction. What he could not accept was an environment where the owner’s emotions spilled into the dressing room.
Saputo’s criticism, delivered directly to players after a heavy defeat, left Nancy feeling undermined. In his view, authority had been taken away in front of the squad and the line between ownership and coaching had blurred. That sense of professional boundaries being broken was the moment Nancy began planning his exit. Columbus Crew later paid compensation to bring him in, and he flourished there inside a calmer, more structured organisation.
Celtic’s hierarchy is known for being hands-on in recruitment and long-term planning, but not for storming dressing rooms or publicly berating staff. Nancy’s issue in Montréal was not structure; it was behaviour. At Columbus, he worked under tight roster rules, a sporting-director model and a recruitment department with heavy influence. He embraced it. His success in Ohio is proof that he can thrive inside a club-led system if the lines are respected.
What Celtic must recognise is that Nancy values clarity. He wants to know where responsibilities lie and he wants consistency in how authority is handled. If those conditions are met, he has shown he can elevate players, build identity and handle pressure. If those conditions wobble, Montréal’s example shows he will not tolerate blurred boundaries.
Celtic’s board have a long history of tension with managers over transfers, timing of signings and internal control. But Nancy is not a manager who demands to run recruitment or take over every football decision. He is comfortable fitting into a defined structure. What he will not accept is interference that crosses into the dressing room or undermines his role.

Montréal’s fallout shouldn’t be seen as a red flag. It should be seen as a blueprint. Nancy flourishes when the structure around him works as intended and where roles are respected. Celtic’s system mirrors Columbus far more than it resembles Montréal, which is exactly why the club see him as such a good fit.
The lesson from Canada is simple: give him space to lead, trust the process and maintain professional boundaries. If Celtic do that, Nancy has everything required to succeed in Glasgow.












2 responses
Does anyone really want the club to decide who we sign? Destined to buying loads of players for 2m or so who mostly aren’t up to it. Manager must have input.
Most Celtic fans are got one complaint jj the clubs board the last two seasons is there ability to get signing done we have lost good players with the fans velieve we lost iut to aston villia for john McGhinn my thoughts on it was McGhinn went for the big wages Celtic couldnt match abd nothing changed my mind no matter who he tells people Celtic supporters